6 "I was sexually aroused when I [cross]dressed, which made me think, ah-ha , I'm a transvestite," said Gwen; although Maura, Alison, Nancy, Taylor, or Karen could have said it.These six interviewees said that they had used crossdressing sexually, essentially playing the roleerotic transvestites. To reconcile these sexual experiences with their current transsexual identity,interviewees needed to tell stories that diminished the erotic components of wearing women'sclothing. If they could not accomplish this, they would leave open the question that they mightnot be transsexuals, which could have undermined their transition into womanhood. Interviewees who recalled crossdressing for private masturbation rituals, which included Nancy, Taylor, Karen, Gwen, and Maura, employed emotions as evidence that disconfirmederotic transvestitism. After saying that crossdressing "started as a fetish," Nancy said that sucharousal dissipated as she came to terms with transsexuality: "I was sexually aroused by it, but asI got older it was something more serious, more of an identity." Gwen said that crossdressing "isbecoming more of an everyday part of my life [and now] I don't get aroused." Here we can seehow regularly enacting an identity (Gwen) and vague references to an identity (Nancy) thatinterviewees had already came to terms with was a resource to account for a change in eroticfeelings, which also distanced themselves from a closely related but discarded identity(transvestite). A similar strategy was used by Maura when she described a dramatic recognition of her "female" true self as disconnecting eroticism from crossdressing. There were a couple of moments that I dressed in hose and heels, and maybe this waseven before the earrings, that I turned around and looked at myself in the mirror and itwas just electric. There was a person there. It was female. This was not a man in adress. I was there seeing my self as a woman and after that, the connection with malesexuality just snapped. And it's never been there again in any strength. . . . The oldconnection between lingerie or whatever and male sexual response is just not thereanymore since I've seen myself this way [i.e., as a transsexual]. Although Maura had used crossdressing for sexual release for about twenty-five years, her storyof recognizing her differently gendered true self in the mirror "snapped" the sexual associationwith women's clothes. Although it may not be surprising that men in their 30s, 40s, or 50s whohad used women's garments for masturbation for 15-30 years no longer became as aroused bythis activity as they had been in their teens, our point is that narratively breaking with thetransvestite role was necessary for interviewees to embrace their transition into womanhood. Breaks from interviewee's erotic past, however, were not always complete. Under such conditions, transsexuals had to account for being aroused from wearing women's clothes. Themost common approach was to blame biology. When Maura latter revealed that she still gets "alittle erection" when trying on a new piece of women's clothing, for example, she blamed"testosterone poisoning" and said that such arousal should end when she begins takinghormones. More generally, blaming biology also enabled transsexuals to distance themselvesfrom transvestites when talking about the origins of their own erotic crossdressing. Nancy, Karen, Gwen, Taylor, and Wendy claimed that they first crossdressed before they reached ten years of age and it was only during puberty that they began used crossdressing formasturbation. For example, after she had been dressing in women's clothing for "seven yearsbefore I had my first orgasm," Taylor added, "so my reaching puberty and beginning tomasturbate and becoming sexual was just coincidental with my crossdressing." Using culturalnotions of the male sex drive kicking in during puberty, interviewees sometimes used the bit ofsexual ideology that describes the penis as uncontrollable "with a mind of its own." Gwen, forexample, said that maybe she was aroused when crossdressed because "maybe I just felt sexyand a penis being what it is, an external sexual organ doesn't require much to wake up."
7 Interviewees thus used cultural ideologies about male sexuality (Teifer 19??) to bolster theirclaims to be women. Besides using biological ideology to discount the potential significance of being aroused while crossdressing, transsexuals also distanced themselves from transvestites by emphasizingthat they did not need to crossdress to get sexually aroused. Taylor, for example, said: "I havenever needed to be crossdressed to become aroused. In fact, I would generally take off thewomen's clothes before I would ejaculate so I wouldn't mess them up." Interpreting taking offwomen's clothes before she ejaculated, was now interpreted by Taylor as indicating that shedidn't need to crossdress to become aroused and thus was never really a transvestite. Interviewees also said that when they crossdressed for supposedly erotic purposes that they had feelings beyond the erotic, as Karen revealed: I hit puberty around sixth grade and from about that point until the time I started graduateschool I insisted to myself that the only reason that I did it was for the erotic stimulationduring masturbation. But by the time that I was in graduate school that wasn't the truth.[I]t wasn't like I put on a pair of panties, masturbate, and be done with it. It was putsomething on and I'd feel great pleasure. I got more pleasure from the dressing up thanfrom [masturbation] and that was hard to reconcile. "I shouldn't think that way. Ishouldn't feel that way." And I'd get dresses and skirts. I'd get makeup and perfume. Iwould figure out ways to stuff a bra. I would do all these things that didn't have anyerotic components. Narratively using non-erotic pleasurable feelings and wearing women's clothing that she claimeddid not have sexual connotations helped Karen define her previously held identity 'transvestite'as false consciousness. Karen and most other interviewee's stories about crossdressing alsoemphasized that wearing women's clothes helped them feel more like women (more on thisbelow). Distancing themselves from eroticized crossdressing helped transsexuals was a kind oflinguistic identity closure. Maura, Alison, and Taylor told sto ries about incorporating crossdressing into sexual games with wives and girlfriends. Due to the explicit eroticism of such encounters, intervieweeshad to render them as leaving the true self incomplete. Although these interviewees said thatthey initially enjoyed crossdressing with their lovers, they claimed that they eventually came torealize that it wasn't emotionally satisfying. Alison's account was typical: [My second wife] liked me to wear her underwear when we went to bed. And I thought,"Oh God I'm in heaven. Thank you Jesus!" Finally a woman understands the way I am.As time went on, it progressed to where I was wearing more and more female clothing,but only when we made love—only when we made love. But that was enough to keepme going. But then again it was like, "This is not what I want. I like what I'm wearingbut I still want to be her." By depicting crossdressing sexually with partners as leaving herself feeling incomplete, Alisonwas able to distance herself from the identity 'transvestite'. Furthermore, her rendition pointedherself toward changing into the woman she now presents herself as. Overall, interviewees depicted crossdressing as unnecessary for sexual arousal, losing its erotic edge over time, evoking pleasure beyond the sexual, and leaving the true self unsatisfied.They had given erotic transvestitism a try, but their stories strategically used emotions asdisconfirming this alternative masculinity. Painting themselves as inauthentic transvestitesforeshadowed, for many interviewees, trying out the identity 'crossdresser'. In the transgender
8 community, crossdressers were defined as men who presented themselves as a woman on a parttime basis in order to express their "feminine side." All of the interviewees except Jan had defined themselves as non-erotic crossdressers before deciding that the identity 'transsexual' was a better fit. Defining themselves ascrossdressers was appealing because it allowed them to express femininity without going throughthe dramatic life transition required of transsexuals. They could crossdress on occasion, go tosupport group meetings, and not have to worry about coming out to family, friends, oremployers. Crossdressers could thus maintain the privileges of men in their public lives andenjoying being women in private. Crossdressers often said that they enjoyed "the best of bothworlds." In interviewees' coming out of denial stories, however, they depicted themselves as not fully enjoying the identity 'crossdresser'. Gwen, for example, described working with hercohabiting girlfriend Renee to find her true self as follows: [W]e were trying to figure out what slot I fit into and we decided that let's trycrossdressing. Let's see if you can be happy crossdressing. And there were parts of itthat were fun. It was fun to be with her as a women. [B]ut it brought even morehumiliation and confusion because I wasn't happy with that. I felt like I looked reallydumb. I hadn't changed my physic or my outer appearance very much. My eye browswere still very heavy. I had a lot of body hair, that kind of thing. So I really looked likea guy dressed up like a woman. Not like a girl. And that made me unhappy and I justfelt like an idiot. Also, all this happened behind closed doors, closed windows. For twonights a week I'd shut all the blinds and in our house and dress up like a girl and feel likean idiot. And that was very degrading. Gwen's story was typical in that feelings were used as a resource to claim that crossdressing wasnot liberating the true self. Other interviewees emphasized that crossdressing was unfulfillingwhen done alone in private and even in support groups. One transsexual, described trying out the identity 'crossdresser' by attending meetings of Tri-Ess, a national organization for crossdressers: I got involved with Tri-Ess, but really, they were crossdressers. That's their whole thingand that was just not fulfilling. I tried it, I thought, "let's see." And there again I justdiscovered real fast that they're playing games and I thought I am so much different thanthey are. They're playing games and to me, this isn't a game, this is real, this is seriousstuff. For transsexuals, expressing your "true self" is serious business, not something to be mocked ortaken lightly. The person quoted above tried to belong to a group of crossdressers in a sense she was "trying out" that identity. After a while, she said, she felt unfulfilled, which wasinterpreted to mean that still hadn't found her "true self." It was as if her feelings signaled,'wrong identity, try again!' Overall, Trying out alternative masculinities furthered a story in which the decision to become transsexual was not a rash one. In fact, the narratives portrayed transsexuals as carefulin trying to make sure that their feelings were not caused by anything else. Fighting depression as men. Maura, Karen, Taylor, Jan, Nancy, and Gwen said that coming toterms with transsexuality involved bouts with depression. Depression was sometimes defined asresulting from tenacity of the differently gendered true self. After saying that transsexualismwas "surfacing more and more," Maura said: "[T]he reason for the depression was simply thefeeling that this was going to come up and (pausing and beginning to whisper) I just couldn't
9 deal with it. Here on a subconscious level I was going, 'No, no, no, no, I can't be a woman, Ican't do this, people will hate me." Besides pointing to a subconscious recognition of transsexuality, interview ees also suggested that depression was caused by trying to silence the true self. After Taylor said that shetried to sustain denial by engaging in several masculine hobbies, for example, she said: But the feelings just kept on pushing and pushing and pushing and I finally got to where Icouldn't mask them anymore. I went through a two or three year period of just reallyserious decline in emotional and physical health because of that. Had no energy, went nowhere, did nothing. . . . Really didn't have a life. And finally, almost exactly a yearago, I got to where couldn't sleep anymore and my throat felt sore all the time . . . And soI made an appointment with my doctor [who said] I had classic symptoms of depressionand anxiety, so he referred me to a psychiatrist. Here Taylor narratively rendered depression as a result of trying to squelch the true self as it wastrying to assert itself more and more. Drawing on therapeutic discourse, transsexuals' storiesimplied that the true self was a powerful force and that denying it expression would causedetrimental side effects to mental and physical health. Feelings of depression became so intense for Taylor, Maura, and Karen that they had contemplated suicide. Stories of suicide were also common in the transgender community as awhole. Using suicide in coming out of denial stories required transsexuals to link suicidaltendencies to gender issues. Karen, who had previously identified herself as a crossdresser,accomplished this by saying: What ultimately led up to admitting transsexualism [was] I had gone into a very deepdepression. About the only thing I accomplished with any degree of competence lastspring was a detailed planning of my death. . . . I got a great deal of peace out of theprospect that it's only going to go on for X many weeks and then I'm gong to stick 10cc's of air in my arm and my heart is going to stop, no problem. At that point I wasn'tassociating any of this with the gender problems. But one of the things that touched thatoff was when they shut down [a transgender email list] and I felt just completely cut offfrom everybody. Karen, who defined herself as a crossdresser at the time, thus framed the cause of her depressionas resulting from not being able to express her feminine side in cyberspace. Although Karenexperienced a more debilitating depression than most other interviewees, framing her emotionaltroubles in gendered terms was common. In interviewees coming out of denial narratives,depression was defined as a side effect of not expressing the true selves. Arguing that stories of depression strategically justified gender switching is not meant to diminish the seriousness of emotional turmoil. Our point is to examine how emotions were usednarratively to account for a life course transition. Depression was an especially usefulbiographical resource in this endeavor because telling others about the depression in effect askedlisteners to be sympathetic (see Clark 1987). As a listener, the interviewer for this studydisplayed (and felt) sympathy by deferring to storytellers' accounts, which helped preserve bothour faces (Goffman 1967). Depression tales were also especially useful in buttressing storytellers' decision to dramatically alter their life course. By rendering depression and suicidal planning as resultingfrom denying transsexuality, they in effect defined not becoming women as a path that wouldinevitably invoke such undesirable feelings. Therefore, their narrative use of depressionpromoted transitioning into womanhood because to turn back now became literally defined asself-destructive. In addition, stories of depression were often tied to epiphanies, which weredramatic turning points in the transsexual's life stories.
10 Interviewees' narratives generally depicted the path out of depression meant as coming to terms with transsexuality. While working with a therapist through her depression, Taylor hadbeen examining her childhood by, in part, having guided conversations with herself as a "littleboy" that had been locked up in a metaphorical box in her mind. But then Taylor started lookingin other boxes during her spare time: "In exploring these things, I went around and opened a boxand there's a little girl." Taylor said that "once it was out, it couldn't be locked back up again.she could never again," and thus decided to "deal with it and see what happens." Alison told of her depression related epiphany as follows: On three consecutive evenings I had an identical suicidal fantasy. It was a little moreintense each evening. The fantasy was of me dressing in my favorite outfit and climbinga ladder and hanging myself from that beam up there [pointing to the beam going acrossthe cathedral ceiling]. And the first two nights th e fantasy was a first -person fantasy, me experiencing it in the first person, doing it. The third night, the point of view changed tothat of a female, sitting right where you are, watching me doing it, with the femalegetting off on it sexually as the pseudo transvestite killed himself. As I was having thisfantasy it occurred to me that this was sick, I've got a problem here. I couldn't stop thefantasy from playing all the way through. And at that point, that was when I knew I hadto deal with it. I couldn't push it back anymore. And you see this set of encyclopediashere (reaching over and picking out a volume and opening it up to a marked page). Iknew there was an article on sex reassignment and I had never allowed myself to read it.And there's a passage in here that hit me hard and I'll read it to you. "The developmentalbiographies of transsexuals vary. One type is that of effeminate males and conversely ofvirile females. Such people have a history of active erotic imagery if not experience fromsame-sex partners from a very early age. A second type is that of a person who, even ifhe or she manifested no crossgender signs in childhood or adolescence, was alwayssecretly obsessed with being sex reassigned. At puberty this person's erotically inert.The third type is the person who has a history of transvestitism. Manifesting, two names,two wardrobes, two personalities until middle life, under the pressure of a major lifecrises, full blown transsexualism emerges." And my respiration rate pretty much doubledmore or less instantaneously when I read that. I said to myself, "This is you. Payattention asshole." Alison said she could no longer deny her transsexualism after this revelation. Authenticity as Women. Stories of coming out of denial did not only emphasize feeling inauthentic and depressed living as men. Interviewees' narratives also stressed the importance of feeling authentic aswomen. Having tried alternative masculinities such as gay and crossdressing men wereparticularly useful biographical resources that could be used to claim feelings of authenticitywhile behaving in ways deemed to be feminine. In this section, we will discuss howinterviewees used emotional references to describe trying out femininity and/or imaginingthemselves as women. The three main ways transsexuals claimed feeling authentic as womenwas by telling stories about (1) feminizing dress; (2) feminizing sexuality; and (3) feminizing thebody. Feminizing Sexuality. Transsexuals often said that sexual orientation had nothing to do with gender, but like most people, they assumed the two were connected. As Nancy put it: When I come out to people . . . the first thing some of them say is, "Are you gay orbisexual?" But gender has nothing to do with sexual orientation. So there's some
11 confusion out there. Yes, I'm attracted to women. So when I have my operation I guessI'll be a lesbian. The concept of sexual orientation necessarily depends on the concept of gender. Thecombination of the gender of those they were attracted to and their own gender determinedsexual orientation, as it does for everyone. In contrast to how they used sexuality to distance themselves from erotic transvestites, interviewees coming out narratives used other recollections of sexuality to bolster their identitytranssexual. They did this through what we call "feminizing sexuality," which refers to the wayspeople render sexual encounters, feelings, and fantasies as indicative of true womanhood.Interviewees interpreted previous sexual encounters with men or women (when they definedthemselves as men) as suggesting they were really women. In our culture, part of being a "real man" is to have sex with women. Because of this, transsexuals who had heterosexual sex as men often reinterpreted such expressions of desire inways that suggested that were not really "real men" after all. In explaining how she wasdifferent than other men, for example, Nancy said: I feel more sensitive in lovemaking, for instance. I enjoy cuddling, embracing; a lot ofguys want to get straight at it. . . . In fact, I've asked partners to take the top position. Iguess I enjoy all positions, but I like to be the more passive one. Here Nancy narratively aligned herself with stereotypes about women's sexuality, suggestingthat even as a man having sex with women that her differently gendered true self foundexpression. As social constructionists of sexuality point out (Tiefer 19??), desire is more in the mind than in the body. Gwen seemed to agree when she said, "When I [as a man] slept with women, Ifantasized that I was a woman with a guy." After coming to define herself as a transsexual, shethus reinterpreted heterosexual sex as an expression of heterosexual desire as a woman. Herstory pointed her in the direction of heterosexual womanhood, which she was currentlytransitioning into. Interviewees who had sex with men as men also rendered these experiences as brining out the woman hidden inside. Mandy, for example described her gay sexual encounters ashelping her become "more strongly identified as a woman sexually." She represented her sexualrelationship with a roommate as follows: With Michael, I really started to feel much more in the feminine role, which was good,though I didn't really tell him. But in our sexual relationship it was obvious who wasmore of the aggressor and who wasn't. And obviously I wasn't. So, that was good. Mandy thus relied on cultural stereotypes of women's sexuality to align herself withwomanhood. Mandy thought her passivity in sex with Michael was "good" because it wasanother step in recognizing that her true self was womanly. Stories of sexuality were not only constructed as a step toward womanhood, but interviewees could also depict sexual encounters as life altering epiphanies. After a divorce,Taylor began crossdressing as a woman and going to a gay bar where she met John who becamea "lifelong friend" and, for a time, her lover. She described their first romantic encounter asfollows: It was the most remarkable experience of my life. It was nothing like I thought it wasgoing to be. He treated me totally female, not male. [H]e didn't rush me into it. We saton the couch, we talked, he put his arm around me, we hugged, we kissed, he undressed
12 me slowly. He picked me up and carried me to the bedroom. That was a thrill all alone.. . . He explained everything to me. What to do. What he was going to do. What it wasgoing to feel like. Everything. I had never even touched a man before. Never. And Iwas touching him. And it was the strangest it was like it didn't feel strange, it felt natural. And we made love. Slow tender love. . . . When I was with him, I felt soooofemale. Not just looking female, dressed female, but I felt female. And that changed me.That was the final hurdle, step, conquest, that was it. When that happened I knew, "No,you've not made a weird decision, you've not been strange all these years, finally, finally,girl, you've found out who you are and know that you are not gay," even though I waswith a man. I knew it. He didn't treat me that way . . . Straight people cannot understandthat. They go, "He's got a dick, you've got a dick, right? That means you're gay." Itwas there, but the way he treated it was not like a masculine thing. It was like a femininething. Does that make sense? He didn't treat it like it was a, quote, penis; he treated itlike it was a vagina. Interpretation is more powerful than the body. After coming to define themselves as transsexuals and acquiring the skills to pass in public, being an object of sexual desire as a woman was seen by some interviewees as evokingfeeling like a woman. While filling her car up with gas recently, Maura (dress as a woman) said: One man walked out and gave me what I think is a politically correct second glance.Men aren't supposed get to look at women these days and if they're going to do it theycan't look like they're interested. And it was a look, look away, look back with a verybored face and then look away after another couple of seconds. [Q: How did that makeyou feel?] (pause) It was nice. I felt like I had achieved something. Although Maura was attracted to women and felt "a little uncomfortable" having a man checkher out, it made her feel more like a woman. In a culture of "compulsory heterosexuality" (Rich198?), it's not surprising that sexual objectification was defined as confirming womanhood. The promise of validating their differently gendered true selves through sex with men led some interviewees who had only been attracted to women, including Maura and Karen, toconsider trying out sex with both men and women after surgery. Although Karen had alwaysbeen "attracted to women," she said she will "try it out both ways and see what happens." Thepull for Karen was the promise of affirming her femininity: "There is a dramatic validation ofone's femininity in being able seduce a man. The same thing doesn't apply to being able toseduce a woman." Here we can see how the cultural notions of gender and sexuality not only shape how interviewees told stories about their pasts but also their futures. Such stories also shaped thechoices they made in the present. During the interview with the first author (who was passing asa man at the time), for example, Wendy, who invited the first author to a hockey game a weekearlier, said: This will probably throw you for little bit of a loop. There are times when I really, reallyfeel feminine that I have a high need to cuddle and it would be really awkward for me tocuddle with a woman. My only choice is a guy and I'm really struggling with that but Iwould really like to go either with a paid escort or with someone who is gay or someonewho would do it as a courtesy. Go out on a date, dancing, theater, dinner, and whatever. .. . That's what I would like as my next experience. I'm trying to figure out how toachieve that. Like the other night at the hockey game, that was a borderline experience. Iappreciate that.
13 Wendy then asked the interviewer if he would go out on a date with her. Wendy was trying toinitiate a scenario that could later be incorporated into her self-development plot. During theinterview, the interviewer was thus turned into a potential resource for Wendy to have herwomanhood affirmed though heterosexual intimacy. Feminizing the body. Pondering the future of sexual relationships was tied to most transsexuals' decisions to seek sex reassignment surgery. They wanted to be loved. They desiredthe intimacy of romantic relationships. But who would love them if hormones had initiatedbreast development and rendered their penis inert but still there? The fear was that no one could.Or worse, they would be pervert magnets. Maura said that what made her examine whether she was really a transsexual before coming out was that "I realized I wanted to be accepted in a physical relationship as a woman,and that's going to be real hard to do given my body." Karen said the significance of surgerywas that "it allows sexual interaction with the proper equipment." Taylor said surgery "enablesyou to function sexually as a female," which she felt was "a pretty strong need." "In terms of mysexuality, [surgery] is just really important," said Jan, who added, "I don't want to have arelationship with a male, but it's really important for me to change [my body] in order to havephysical relationships as a woman. . . and it's also is very important to me to have other womenbe able to accept me as a woman." Transsexuals thus believed that acceptance, whether as heterosexual, lesbian, or bisexual women, would be easier if they could make their bodies conform to people's expectations. Thenon-transgendered maximize acceptance by working at it from the other direction. That is, non-transgendered people work to make their gendered appearance conform to the kinds of bodiesthat gendered appearances are supposed to signify. Surgery was not only defined as necessary so as to expand the market of potential partners, but several interviewees' narratives constructed pasts in which they despised their malebodies. In order to fix their feelings, they believed they needed to change their bodies.Therapeutic discourse, with its emphasis on the sanctity of emotions, made invoking emotions intheir accounts inviolable. Taylor said, "some people, including myself, have a great loathing fortheir genitals. I find my genitals repulsive. I can not bear to look at them, I can barely bare totouch them." Alison said, "for years and years I looked in the mirror and I didn't know who thatwas. I looked in the mirror and instead of seeing a nude male in my minds eye I was seeing anude female, but a few body parts that weren't suppose to be there, which I hated. I didn't wantthem there." Jan said, "For me, the most important thing about this is how I feel about my body.And that's something that for as long—since I was five, I've felt really strongly that my bodyshould be female." After interviewees talked about their "feelings" about their bodies, the interviewer did not continue to ask them "What do you really mean?" As Garfinkel (1967) has pointed out,language is indexical and one could ask such questions indefinitely without ever gaining aprecise understanding of another person's experience. Furthermore, the interviewer wassomewhat worried about insulting the interviewees and did not want to sabotage the interview orundermine future interviews. The interviewer was working on his own life course transition,from student to professor, and needed to conduct X many interviews in order to satisfygatekeepers. Because of these institutional and interactional constraints, the interviewergenerally deferred to interviewees comments about feelings, in effect helping to maintain"feelings" as a resource transsexuals could use to narratively construct a past that made it seemas though sex reassignment surgery was inevitable. Having decided to change their bodies, the next step for interviewees was to being taking synthetic hormones to feminize their bodies. In the transgender community, hormones were seen
14 as not only affecting them physically, but emotionally. As Taylor, who was planning to begantaking hormones soon, put it: The next big step is starting the hormones. That's going to have of course the physicalside effects, which are kind of trivial compared to what it does to you emotionally. [Q:What does it do?] There's two aspects to the emotional impact. Part of it is just theknowledge of what you are doing to yourself. The knowledge that if you do this longenough that you're going to become sterile probably permanently, you're going tobecome impotent, you're going to loose interest in sex. Knowing before you growbreasts that you are going to grow breasts. Knowing before your hips and thighs fill outthat they are going to and then dealing with those things emotionally as they happen. Starting hormones was often seen as a turning point, often calling it their birthday. Alison said"my birthday is April 19" and said: I remember when I got the prescription filled and I sat in the car and I took that pill outand I looked at it and it was April 19. Four thirty in the afternoon and I took that first pilland that's when everything turned around. From that point on there was no turning back.[O]ne morning I was standing there and I kind of turned sideways and I went, "Damn,there's a little something there." Not much, but more than had ever been there before.[Q: How did that make you feel?] I was in the best mood. Taking hormones not only seen as a turning point, but also was defined as instigating emotionsculturally marked as feminine. For example, after Jan began taking his wife's birth control pillstwo years earlier, I felt I was a lot more emotional, a lot in touch with my feelings. And I am able toexpress my feelings a lot better. So that was the biggest change. . . . My interests havechanged a lot. It used to be that when I go to the bookstore, I'd go to the science andcomputer section or whatever, and in the last couple years, I've been getting a lot moreinto nature and, things like growing plants and things. And so no matter when I go to thebook store, first I go and check out the books, the gardening books. . . . But I'm definitelyvery much more into relationships. You know, I mean connecting with people and beingin nature, and not at all into technology. Jan, who repeatedly described herself as a feminist who was not into traditional gender roles,nonetheless said that taking synthetic female hormones made her more emotional and concernedabout relationships. Surgery was not seen by interviewees making themselves real women. Karen put it most bluntly, "if your not a woman before you go to Montreal [to have surgery] you won't be afterthey hack it off and turn it inside out." Transsexuals believed that they were truly women beforethe surgery. If they weren't absolutely sure of this, they would have never sought surgery. Toprepare themselves for surgery, Vivian, the therapist that most of the interviewees saw (who wasthe co-leader of the transgender support group) helped them come to terms with their futurebodiliy transformation. Taylor recalled this as follows: Vivian put me through a visualization exercise last time and the stated goal of theexercise was to say good-bye to my genitals. [Q: So what did you do?] Well the way sheset it up was [that] you are alone in a very comfortable chair in a very comfortable room,fire in the fireplace. You're utterly at ease. And you gradually become aware of another
15 presence in the room. That presence is your genitals, which are there for you to bid them farewell. She told me to speak to her as if I was speaking to my genitals in the first person. I'm afraid I wasn't very nice to my genitals. I wound up shedding a few tearsnot in remorse for loosing them but in regret and frustration for the pain that they have cause me in the past four decades. I will be glad when they are gone, eagerly anticipated departure. Here we can see how fictional stories co-constructed with therapists can generate emotional experiences that can be recalled to reinforce the decision for sex-reassignment surgery. For transsexuals, emotional experiences were rendered as indicating that a woman was locked inside their male bodies. Within therapeutic discourse, such a true self needs to be accepted and brought into existence. The true self was not as malleable as the body. As Karenput it: There's this article, it's basically anti-transsexual— these people are claiming [sex reassignment surgery is] similar to a woman who goes in and tries on a shoe and it doesn't fit and has foot surgery so the shoe fits. I think it's the other way around, the body turns into the shoe and needs to be changed. A very intimate suit of clothes: the birthday suit.
CONCLUSION [TO BE WRITTEN]
留言